Dave Donohue: nerd-in-residence

Entries categorized as ‘Publishing’

WSJ’s excellent overview of business magazines

October 13, 2007 · No Comments

Yesterday Matthew Karnitschnig wrote an outstanding overview of the latest ways that BusinessWeek, Forbes, and Fortune are responding to Web competition - and to Conde Nast’s Portfolio. For example:

“Still, both Fortune and BusinessWeek are responding. BusinessWeek is narrowing its focus by emphasizing core business coverage and retreating from lifestyle areas. [emphasis mine] The shift is reflected in the redesigned magazine, which sports a cleaner look. Gone is the magazine’s “Executive Life” section, which included lifestyle pieces on subjects such as New Zealand spas and powder skiing in New Mexico.

In a world of nonstop information and ever busier schedules, BusinessWeek’s readers want a concise take on the week’s business news, says BusinessWeek President Keith Fox. “Readers want an intelligent filter,” he says.”

Louise Story at the NYT has a related piece in yesterday’s paper, focusing on ways in which BusinessWeek’s redesign were at least partially in response to Web properties.

I find these kinds of articles to be invaluable. In PR, it’s so easy to fall into the trap that press has just one side - editorial. In reality, there are an awful lot of folks on the publishing side who are busting their humps to keep afloat in an ever-changing world. It’s important to understand both, and these two articles definitely helped my understanding.

Categories: Publishing · Uncategorized

Will Wikiscanner uncover a lot of smoking guns?

August 20, 2007 · 1 Comment

Katie Hafner wrote a great overview of Wikiscanner in today’s New York Times.  This story has gotten legs since Wired News uncovered the tool last week (I can’t locate a link to the original story anywhere - if someone bookmarked it, would you comment below?).

If you or your client have ever broken Wikipedia’s rules on editing or providing content without an objective point of view,  the NYT article is a must-read.  However unlikely it is that you’re called out on it, if you are, you want to have some good responses ready.

If you haven’t, then I still recommend the article, as well as my post from April this year that offers some words from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales on how PR people can successfully interact with Wikipedia content.

Categories: Publishing · Wikipedia

Broadcast video, Internet streams, and new metrics

July 12, 2007 · No Comments

Like many music fans - especially those of us trying to avoid heat and humidity - I spent much of Saturday trying to tune in what I could of the Live Earth shows being held around the world. Even on Charlottesville’s relatively archaic cable system, I was able to juggle performances in London, the US, Sydney, andTokyo via Bravo, CNBC, NBC, and the Sundance Channel. I understand that US-based satellite customers and those with the means to hack into Intelsat’s feed actually got to see quite a bit more over the course of the day.

On Tuesday, I was shocked to see how poorly the event fared by conventional broadcast standards, at least in the US and UK. Here in the US, it came in dead last, beaten handily by Fox Networks’ reruns of America’s Most Wanted, of all things. While the US live broadcast pulled in less than three million viewers, MSN is claiming that it streamed the Live Earth feed more than 10 million times over the course of the day, surpassing by far a record set by Live 8 in 2005.

Those numbers are by no means apples to apples. Streams misfire, users log off and on, you name it. Clearly, however, they indicate that a sizable portion of the lucrative audience of youngish music consumers was watching Saturday’s happenings via their MacBooks, laptops, or something other than their TVs. If they even own TVs.

I’m no broadcast expert and rely on some brilliant colleagues to help me understand the mysteries of radio and TV, but as far as I can tell grand-scale events like Live Earth are finding their true audiences on the Web. That has an impact for advertisers, for sure, but for PR people it creates a huge opportunity to extend the shelf life of a broadcast. Some users will rewind their TiVo’d hours of NBC coverage for some finite amount of time, but you can still watch Live Earth days later right now via the Web, and that will continue to be the case for weeks, if not months.

Simultaneously, the page view - the metric that we all used to use to benchmark the success of, well, everything - was more or less laid to rest this week as well. Online video was specifically cited as one of the drivers behind that decision. It’s not just Google/YouTube that is causing this sea change; upstarts like Revision3 are helping push individual program even as social networks like Facebook make video sharing available to millions of enthusiastic members.

I’m glad I’m not in the advertising game. They have to figure out how to monetize content. We, on the other hand, have a huge opportunity to create it for a lucrative audience that is unmistakably moving towards online platforms.  Elinor Mills at c|net is promising a short-term analysis that should educate all of us.

The fun is just beginning :)

Categories: Events · Measurement · Publishing · Video

My review of Wikinomics

July 3, 2007 · No Comments

My review of Don Tapscott and Anthony D. Williams’ Wikinomics just ran in the July-August issue of Communication World, the magazine of the International Association of Business Communicators. The full issue requires a membership and subscription, but the review itself is available right here.

Categories: Blogging · Bookmarking · Miscellaneous · Publishing · Viral marketing · Web 2.0 · Wikipedia
Tagged:

Print vs. Online

May 25, 2007 · No Comments

As I mentioned earlier this month, I’ve ended my online-only experiment and my print publications are now filling my mailbox again.  I drew the line at newspapers, however.  I read the WSJ online and get the NYT delivered only on Sundays.   None of those are a replacement for RSS feeds and online-only news sources (news.com and IDG News in particular).  It’s just that magazines feel better in my hands.

The tech PR industry talks a lot about print vs. online and what outlets reach which readers.  People smarter than me are figuring out that reach, but this morning I was happy to see that Doc Searls still reads the newspaper.  If Doc reads the newspaper in print, then the medium has a long life ahead of it.  His post was prompted by Andy Kessler’s op-ed in the WSJ today discussing A Future for Newspapers (also on andykessler.com if you don’t have a WSJ subscription).

Both are worth reading.

Categories: Publishing